Personal tools
You are here: Home KFTC's Blog Archive 2010 July 15 More divide and conquer tactics from coal and WYMT
Subscribe to our blog!
RSS 2.0

Enter your email address to receive emails when this blog is updated:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Powered by Quills
Appalachian Transition
Topics
Topics in Detail…
 
Archives
Find us on Facebook

Join KFTC!

 

More divide and conquer tactics from coal and WYMT

by Nancy Reinhart last modified July-19-2010 05:19 PM


By KFTC member Silas House
Originally published in The Courier-Journal

Recently "an anonymous donor" paid for a sign to be made up and displayed at the Stonecrest Golf Course in Prestonsburg, Ky. The sign uses a photo of a semi-nude Ashley Judd that originally appeared on a 2006 cover of Marie Claire magazine. The caption beside the picture reads, "ASHLEY MAKES A LIVING REMOVING HER TOP. WHY CAN'T COAL MINERS?"

The sign is sexist, ignorant and infantile. The sign shows that the coal industry will stoop to any level to pit Appalachians against one another, and illuminates the fact that some people who support mountaintop removal will try to prop up their argument by misconstruing the facts and quotes.

Since Judd's speech on mountaintop removal mining aired, WYMT, the Hazard, Ky., news station (and a sister station of WKYT in Lexington) has repeatedly aired reports on the controversy brewing around her speech. Yet most of the controversy it's reporting on is being created by the station itself. All of its reporting has been incredibly biased. With its coverage of the sign, the reporting was not only biased, but sexist.

"I don’t think Ashley Judd was off base with her criticism of mountaintop removal or her description of it as “the rape of Appalachia,” because, quite frankly, I think she was right. Her only fault was taking a very public stand against mountaintop removal. Doing such a thing is almost sacrilegious in eastern Kentucky, and that’s part of the reason that Diane Sawyer didn’t get a fancy poster after her “documentary” aired.
Read more of Ivy Brashear's reflections on the controversy stirred up by Judd's comments in the Hazard Herald.

The sign came in response to a statement Judd made in a speech she delivered to the National Press Club in June about mountaintop removal, which she opposes. Her exact quote was, "I don't know a whole lot of hillbillies who golf." When put into context, it's clear that Judd is saying that true Appalachians cherish a mountain more than they do a golf course. And she's also pointing out that most MTR sites are not put to any use, despite a handful that have been used for things such as a prison and a golf course.

Much ado has been made of this quote. Those in favor of MTR have used it to say that Judd is using the word "hillbillies" in a negative connotation. They fail to point out that Judd starts the speech with these words: "Being an Eastern Kentuckian is the simple fact that brings me the most honor ... I ... am proud of being a hillbilly." They also say that her golf course quote is perpetuating a stereotype about Appalachians being backward. But they are misconstruing the quote and taking it out of context.

People who pass along this interpretation of the quote are doing exactly what the coal companies want them to do: they're perpetuating a lie and they're letting the importance of the issue get clouded up in something else.

The sign insinuates that Judd has made her career on taking off her clothes. Nudity is sometimes a part of acting, yes. But to imply that Judd has made her living off that is ridiculous. If George Clooney, another Kentuckian, had made the same speech, would they be putting up a sign about him taking off his clothes, since he, too, has appeared nude on film? Of course not. Because he's a man.

Lots of folks in Eastern Kentucky think that destroying the land is a lot more offensive than someone being naked. Yet the news seems to not know they exist, and certainly hasn't interviewed them.

WYMT furthered the sexism by only interviewing men during its report on the sign. The station refused to show the picture because it feared it "might be offensive to some viewers," implying the picture was vulgar instead of an artistic statement. It also threw in its own opinion with little nuggets like this: "We only found one person who thought the sign was a little over the top." That's blatantly leading the viewer/listener, and it's something that journalists are not supposed to do in this sort of report.

I believe everyone has the right to offer their opinion about MTR and Judd's speech, and I welcome differing voices. But twisting words and purposely taking things out of context is just flat-out wrong. It's lying.

When people and the media do this, however, they're doing just what the industry wants them to, as big corporations have always furthered their own causes by dividing and conquering the people. And when they do this they're simply illuminating to most intelligent folks that they don't have enough real facts to back up their argument that MTR is a good thing, so they resort to name calling and lying. That's just pathetic, and I hope more people will start seeing through these tactics.

Read Ashley Judd's comments here.

what is the differance

Posted by F at July-17-2010 11:39 AM
what is differant from WYMT showing only certain people talking about the poster than you all showing MTR only one way and not the after product.i was told you all wouldnt show all about mtr just to get your point across so what is the differance

wymt divide and conquer

Posted by Tammy at July-19-2010 09:38 AM
Leave it to WYMT to portray this in such a sexist way. Appalachians need more flat tops to put more prisons... come on guys. There is no way that taking the top off a mountain can be a good thing-any way you look at it. Whoever put the sign up about Ashley-shame on you! Ashley Judd represents all that is good about KY to everyone else in the USA. Most of the time, they all think we are rednecks-not hillbillies. And the former poster who said to post the good things....what are they? Run off? Less leaves from the trees that are gone? Better hunting cause there is an easier target when it is bare?

Tammy

Posted by F at July-19-2010 02:32 PM
Yes it does cause more run off sometimes but so does parking lots and other concrete places but they have ponds to catch a lot of the sediment.what about parking lots all the oil,gas antifreeze or whatever leaks from a vehicle goes right into a water system.also if you think we have better hunting because of a clearer shot come and visit a older surface mine and see for yourself how dense some are.also some uses are people raising cattle and horses and other livestock on them.shopping centers,homes, just to name a few stuff being built.places to ride atvs and horses and camp,picnic.one the largest atv and horse rides in kentucky is held on a surface mine it might be in the USA i dont know.i can go on and on just like you can find fault.two of the main thing they do is provide a living for a lot of people.also keeps heat,helps keep people cool,lights and way for people to prepare food to eat.a challange to you and anyone that reads this.come and visit a old surface mine,see for yourself what is being done and not take someone elses word for it.

Ashley Represents all that is good?

Posted by Todd at July-19-2010 04:46 PM
Tammy,

Please elaborate as to the things Ashley does to represent all that is good about Kentucky and what makes her different than the duo with Halfway to Hazard?

About the sign, should we censor people's opinions? I mean, if Ashley can state opinion in an open forum, shouldn't another person have the right to differ from her? No need to shame the person who put the sign up or to shame Ashley. Both parties stated opinions, which the last I checked we still have that right.... I think... Who knows anymore.

Personally, Im sick and tired of the crying and whining on both sides. When will you stop and reach across enemy lines to talk to someone with a different opinion? Its as simple as that, yet we live in a society where you have to belong to one side or the other. I may have differing beliefs on coal than most from KFTC but goodness, I dont despise or hate anyone who has different thoughts. Thats how we learn! We communicate to each other and respect one another. Together, we can reach a solution but chastising and brow beating the other side will get us no were.

Am I the only one who feels this way?

Todd

good point

Posted by F at July-19-2010 10:35 PM
Todd you make a good point in both sides getting togather and have a goal to work for.I too am tired of hearing from both sides and nether wanting to work with the others.i sat down with one member of KFTC and we had a good talk.he wanted see from a miners viewpoint dont think ether one of us changed the others mind but it was a starting point all the miners hear is how dumb they are from working on a MTR site or we a rapist and could go on and on.no one want to be talked about like that.there is collage grads working on the mines along with other smart people but when some strangers pulls up beside your car gives you the good ole middle finger and calls you names what would anyone do.i too would like to find another line of work but what are there.no one will want to retrain a 56 old person to do another job.i know the green job could replace the mining jobs but where are they at right now.i agree in time the use of coal is going to go down and that is the reason i wanted my kids and grand kids get good schooling and stay away from the mines.they have had to move off and a lot of people dont like having to do that.lets see if we all cant work something out to help the envoirment and keep jobs also.i know it can be done