KFTC members in DC this week
| Group photo from the Washington DC delegation. Photo by Mary Kroeck |
Members of KFTC and several other ally groups are in Washington D.C. this week lobbying members of Congress to support the Clean Water Protection Act (H.R. 2169). This bill would expand the Clean Water Act to prohibit the dumping of mining waste into rivers and streams, effectively outlawing the practice of valley fills. The Clean Water Protection Act currently has 129 co-sponsors in the House (including Reps. Ben Chandler and John Yarmuth from Kentucky), and we are working to expand that list.
We are asking everyone who cares about protecting our streams to call the Capitol Message Line (202-225-3121) and leave a message for your member of Congress, asking that they sign on as a co-sponsor to this legislation or thank them if they already have signed on as a co-sponsor.
Talking points for your call
- Tell them that you are their constituent, and that you are calling to request that they to become a co-sponsor of the Clean Water Protection Act, H.R. 2169, introduced by Congressman Frank Pallone of New Jersey and Congressman Christopher Shays of Connecticut.
- Across the Appalachian coalfields, more than 1200 miles of streams have been buried and destroyed by mountaintop removal coal mining.
- The Clean Water Protection Act, H.R. 2169, is necessary to protect clean drinking water for many of our nation’s cities.
- The Clean Water Protection Act is also necessary to protect the quality of life for Appalachian coalfield residents who face frequent catastrophic flooding and pollution or loss of drinking water as a result of mountaintop removal.
Please visit ilovemountains.org for more information on this action and a list of co-sponsors.
BECAUSE COAL TRUCKS KILL!!!!
The guy above me...
Yes, coal is not the only problem we have with our environment, but it presents many unique problems that need special attention. The work that KFTC and ally organizations does is needed and courageous. I am a proud member, and I hope that you decide to look more at an issue before you attack one side needlessly.
The idiot adove me
Road projects do much worse than any coal mine ever does.
If coal mining ever is stopped Eastern Ky will be a ghost town. But you dont understand that because you and every other treehugger I have ever meet or talked to is a IDIOT!
Re:
That having been said, who's talking about doing away with coal mining? KFTC Members just want it done in a way that doesn't utterly destroy the communities we live in.
You can plug your ears and call everyone who wants clean water to drink, good jobs, and clean air to breathe a "treehugger," but I suspect at the end of the day you need all three to live too.
re
Wow
It's like you're the spouse of an abusive husband saying "oh no - it's fine, officer - he doesn't hit me too much - I'm just clumsy and fell down some stairs..." Wake up and get out of this abusive, unhealthy relationship!
"Counties that have produced billions of dollars worth of coal in eastern Kentucky are still among the poorest counties in America. Coal has been mined in eastern Kentucky for over one hundred years. If the coal industry was going to produce prosperity for us, shouldn’t they have done it by now?" (cut from this web site)
kiss where i cant
Catherine Jacobs
By the way coal mining has nothing todo with spouse abuse. Stuoid comparison.
Can anyone explain the camel part of that bill. Sneaky trick.
where did everyone go
Way to go FAT
Coal mining is one of the most regulated business in the country. They are just to blind to see it.
Interesting
It's like they're the same person or something.
Hmmm.
hmmmmm
Liar
DC week
Coal is a finite resource (look that up in the dictionary under F)
I personally think the word these or this person is useing, to describe individuals who are trying to help E. Ky., definitely fits the person who is typing it in.
Had a great week in Washington, Thank GOD all the Politicians aren't in the pocket of the Coal Industry. I heard a rumor while in Wash that the federal gov. is going to mandate a substantial pay raise for Deep Miners. Just a Rumor!
frankfort
By the way would you like to explain the part about the tax break for camels. Pretty sneaky.
pay
Who paid your way leatherneck
i would like to know how you can not have valley fills and surface mine.it dont work never has never will.when you put spoil on benches and places it make them over weight and they slide.i know it looks good on paper but it wont work look at all the old mine sites and see the slide and scars and highwalls showing
DC WEEK
I watched my Father smother to death from black lung, I watched my brother and his family do with out as he suffered thru one surgery after another after being crushed in the mines then die at the young age of 41. I As a KFTC member standing with the widows and supporters of mine safety legislation last year watched as the bill was gutted and watered down to nothing while the politicians and coal industry was saying it was far reaching. That statement was made by Rep. Robin Webb the very one who stood on the steps while the miners were present this year saying I am one of you. I think you should really rethink who the idiots really are. KFTC wants a better standard of living for all its people and when you trample on your neighbor while saying you are bettering yourself is not the right way to bring prosperity to your homeland. The best way to make a difference in our State is to work together to bring positive change. But again if you look at history the coal industry has always played the divide and conquer game. And you are playing right into their hands.
RE
wroking together
The biggest thing to acknowledge is coal is not going to be here forever, according to the Kentucky Geological Survey they say there is only 10 to 20 years of socialbly and environmentally mineable coal left in Central Appalachia. The industry says we have 100 to 200 years left but that is not the truth. So we must think about what we will have left when they get all that they want and leave.
If you look around the world the greatest need of every culture is clean water. People die every few seconds from a lack of it, that is why we feel it is so important to protect it.
As far as where to put the spoil when we challenged a permit with 6 valley fills the engineers reworked the permit that did not do one valley fill and was able to mine the coal. According to the Environmental Impact Study done by the US EPA it said it would only add up to $1.00 per ton of coal. It can be done it just might cost the industry a little from their profit.
We are Appalachians we are strong willed and we must work together to protect our homeland. I think you have the wrong ideal when you say we come in we live here it is our homes also. My GrandMother traveled into Kentucky in a wagon train from Virginia in the late 1800's
I agree
Clean water you say. Then stop the poluters. Straight pipes(raw sewage). There was a study that came out just a few days ago about this countrys water. It said that the major pollution in the countrys water supply was drugs and antibiotics that had went thru the human body then flused down the toilet. Not coal mone runoff. If you are so worried about run off in the water how about construction and road projects. They have no sediment control. If you dont believe me go look at the road project on rte7 at Jeff no runoff controll. What is the difference between a coal mine and them? NONE.
But still you focous on coal mining. You talk about wroking together. Oh by the way you spell it (working). Start where the major problems are and keep it even across the board. Dont focous on just coal mining. The stream saver bill was aimed right at coal mining.
Another thing you all talk about working together and that you are not focousing on coal mining then why dont you post you real name instead of a nickname. It makes me think you are ashmed of what you are saying. But if I was saying what you all are I would be ashamed also. Jonathan Gregory is my real name whats yours?
Re: I agree
But lets not stop there, lets look a little closer. Of the 7 that are not for coal companies, 5 are for either dredging in the Ohio or Green River, which is not burying a stream. The other two are for constructing buildings, one a Lowes and the other a warehouse. This will bury 0.08 miles of perennial stream, 0.38 miles of intermittent and 0.36 miles of ephemeral stream.
Ok, now lets look at the 12 coal mining permits. one is a renewal permit so it doesn't add to the total streams being buried. of the 11 others they bury 0.13 miles of perennial stream and 0.69 acres of wetlands. Not too bad right? But that's not all, they also bury 4.2 miles of intermittent streams and 2.7 miles of ephemeral streams. So there you can see coal mining is burying far more streams than road construction, general housing construction or farming.
But it doesn't stop there. We could also look at the "temporary" impacts. This is very often the distance between the toe of the valley fill and sediment pond. they call this temporary because the coal companies say that as one of the last stages of the bond release they will come back and remove the sediment pond. (My experience is that most of the coal companies end up defaulting on the last few stages of their bond release because it costs them more to move the equipment back in to finish the bonding work than it does to just not get the last little bit of bond money back.) Anyway, sorry for the digression.
Now, back to the "temporary" impacts. These 11 coal mining permits will "temporarily" impact another 0.26 miles of perennial stream, 5.5 miles of intermittent stream and 0.7 miles of ephemeral stream.
I would agree with you that there is a lot of run off damage from bad logging and oil and gas drilling practices. But, as you say, we want to focus on the biggest problem first and clearly coal mines are burying more miles of stream at a much faster rate than any other activity. And yes, I've seen the road destruction happening on Route 7 between Letcher and Perry County, and it is awful. Just so you know, Jean Ritchie, who is from that area wrote to Governor Fletcher to ask him not to go forward with the project. He wrote back thanking her for agreeing with him that the project would greatly improve the road. But even this bad road project is just impacting a small area compared to the hundreds of miles of streams being buried by coal companies.
And as for the straight pipes, by all means please work to put an end to them. They are awful. But we think there are plenty of other organizations working on this issue. PRIDE is working on as are many of the local county governments. But it doesn't do any good to destroy the stream at the headwaters and then try and clean it up further down stream. We have to look at cleaning the entire stream before it will be healthy once again.
re:re: I agree
The other industries that fill streams should be held to the same standards that coal companies are held to. This should be done first.
Re: I agree
The inspector then said that if they did it again they would be fined. Later that night the company let the water go again. The inspector came back out the next day and yelled at the company, but still didn't fine them or issue a violation. The company then tried to open the mine up on the other side of the hill and release the mine water. People in that holler complained as well but no violations were issued.
I know that part of the fault lies with the mine inspectors, but in the end the fault lies with those that are breaking the law. If someone turns their back on someone else breaking the law they both need to take responsibility for the problems.
And the problems from the route 7 construction are from one site, there are literally hundreds if not thousands of mines spread out around the 12 primary coal producing counties. You can see all of these mines by going to this state web site: www.minepermits.ky.gov/mapsspatialdata/interactivemaps.htm and click on the GIS viewer.
And as any organization we all need to choose priorities, PRIDE chooses to focus on cleaning up trash dumps and straight pipes, but they want to turn their back on the burying of headwater streams. That's their choice. Our members choose to focus on the burying of headwater streams. I'd encourage you to be involved an active with organizations that focus on the issues you are most concerned about.
Jonathan and F at, I continue to appreciate your activity on our blog, however your tone at times seems to be less about trying to communicate with others and more about trying to shout or insult others. I realize that some of the responses to some of your statements have also not been in the spirit of encouraging a discussion and that is unfortunate. These are important issues that deal directly with people's lives, their property, their employment and frankly the future of central Appalachia and not to be overly dramatic the future direction of the energy needs of our country.
Eastern Kentucky has a future, and coal will continue to be a part of the present as well as the future, but like it or not, coal production is decreasing. What will we have left in the future? We are looking at places like Carr Creek Lake and Fish Trap Damn as a drinking reservoirs, but all the mining around these lakes is causing them to fill up with sediment three times as fast as the Army Corps predicted. We're turning all of our headwater streams and rivers into sediment filled drainage ditches. And along with this sediment comes heavy metals and compounds that settle out and cover the bottoms of the creeks killing everything in the creek. We still haven't cleaned up the messes from all the mining before the 1977 surface mining laws went into effect and that was over 30 years ago. How long will it take for the region to recover from the problems we are creating today?
We are also working on getting the state to change the way it does economic development. Right now if it's not a project that will bring in 100 or more jobs the state does not want to invest in helping the project work. And lets face it, Toyota or anything like Toyota, is not going to locate in eastern KY. We need to be investing in small cottage industry that is started up by the people living in eastern Kentucky. We need to invest in entrepreneurs, our people who will start out with ideas that will employ maybe 3-5 people to begin with and then help them to grow. This is true about rural areas across the state, but the cabinet for economic development refuses to even evaluate how they are doing let alone change anything. We don't just want to protect our streams, we want to see the region grow and prosper in the same way that other parts of the country grow and prosper. And I don't think that messing ones own nest is a good growth plan.
re:re:re: agree
As far as my tone I treat people the way they treat me. When you came on this blog and addressed me with respect I treated you with respect. But when someone compares the job that I do with beating my wife or gets on the radio and says that if I drive a rock truck that Im a outlaw. I treat them with the same nonrespect that they give me.
You have not said anything about stopping mining (the way I feed my family). But some people in your organization want to stop mining all together. That is ignorance. Every person in the U.S. wether they want to admit it or not uses 3.8 tons of coal a year. If coal mining in EKY is stopped then EKY will stop. There will be no Wal Mart or anything else. These are the facts weather you all like it or not.
re: I agree
I think the core of our disagreement comes is encapsulated in your statement that "If coal mining in EKY is stopped then EKY will stop." I guess I believe that as long as were are so solely dependent on coal, and by that I mean the country depends on coal for about 55 percent of our electricity and in Kentucky it is about 92 percent, then we will never be able to regulate it properly.
I believe you would say the industry is either over regulated or that it is regulated far more than ay other industry. (please correct me if I'm wrong) I would say that there are a lot of regulations, but if the goal of those regulations is to protect people, their property and the environment then those regulations are not working.
Examples of the regulations not working; black lung is as bad as it ever was and it's virtually impossible to get compensation, streams are being buried at an alarming rate, the amount of complaints we receive about blasting damaging people's homes, both deep mining and strip mining destroying people's water wells, just the existence of slurry ponds when there is another method (dry cake pressing method) of processing the coal, the fact that the EPA has not updated air quality standards around processing plants in 20 years when they are suppose to do it every 5 years, the fact that the federal government continues to hire coal industry lobbyists to over see MSHA and OSM, the Martin County sludge flood, that Massey Coal admitted to violating the clean water act by releasing pollution into the streams of eastern Kentucky and West Virginia more than 4,000 time between 2000 and 2006 and they never stopped mining coal for a minute and then we find out that Massey CEO Don Blankenship was given 24 million dollars, that coal mines are hiring more and more temp workers to avoid paying benefits and to keep wages low (the first coal miner wh died this year was a temp worker on a strip mine in Harlan county), that somehow hard packed clay and rock spayed with hydro-seed can be called reclaimed Fish and Wildlife land.... and I could go on and on....
I believe that the only time the mines will ever be able to be adequately regulated is once we lessen our dependence on coal and hopefully all other fossil fuels. If we only used coal for 5-10 percent of our base load electricity then there wouldn't need to be the attitude that we have to move as much coal as possible at all costs.
agree with some thing
okay now the regulations the speed limit is 55.its the law.if a officer sees a person speeding and dont write them a ticket then its not done right.then a little later someone gets killed because this person is speeding then what.maybe if the officer done his job theat person might have lived.there are laws that says mines is not to suppose to release water and so forth into streams and keeep dust down so no black lung plus i can go on and on.if the inspector finds these laws being broken and dont do anything he is as much at wwrong as the coal mines.the law needs to be enforce that are in place right now.if this bill gets passed and is not enforced what good did it do.get the ones enforced that are already there.if a inspector is not doing his job replace him to someone that will and after a few is dismiss i say more will start doing their jobs.thanks you for your time
fish and wildlife
Re: fish and wildlife
This new language can be similar to the original language of the bill or it may be something completely different. Usually the sponsor of the bill that is about to be changed is aware of what is going to happen and is supportive of the changes. And usually the vote to change the language is simply a procedural vote that is usually approved. Then the committee continues with testimony about the new language.
So when the camel bill came before the House Appropriations committee the chairman of the committee had already decided they were going to try and substitute the language of the stream saver bill for the language in the camel bill that exempted camel feed from requiring a sales tax.
Rather than have the procedural vote to insert the language of the stream saver bill before hearing testimony on the new language, the chairman decided to hear testimony on the proposed language, which took two days, and then took a vote on whether to insert the language of the stream saver bill. This procedural move needed a majority of the committee to vote in favor of substituting the language of the stream saver bill for the language in the camel bill, but it received 13 votes in favor of proceeding with the committee substitute, 12 votes against, 3 legislators who abstained and 1 who walked out before the vote.
Committee substitutes are a fairly common practice in Frankfort, this effort simply received a lot of attention. Leadership in the house use it all the time. Sometimes they use it to combine lots of similar bills into one bill, such as what Representative Rocky Adkins did this year with House Bill 2.
The end result would have been a vote on the stream saver bill and the bill would have had nothing to do with camels. Hope that helps explain the process.
sneaky
You still havent addressed my comments about the wildlife around here. But if you dont live in EKY you wouldnt know about them.
Re: Sneeky
Based on your comment, "Who thought it would be a good idea to put the camel bill in the stream saver bill?" It does sound like you do understand the process. One bill is not put into another, they had nothing to do with each other.
And as far as wildlife, you can't be serious that you believe a reclaimed mine site is a healthier ecosystem than a natural forest. As Sam who lives on Big Black Mountain put it, "Now a deer would have to pack a lunch just to cross the mountain into Virginia." And if you're talking about fishing in sediment ponds, I've been to hundreds of these sediment ponds and I've never seen a single fish in any of the ponds. As a matter of fact a KFTC member in Harlan County, Elmer, had a fish pond on his property, but then a coal company filled in the valley above his pond and killed all the fish and turned his pond into an unofficial sediment pond.

Look here for news of mine safety issues.

idiots