House Committee Fails to Pass Stream Saver Bill
"We’ll be back next year, stronger, better and hitting harder. And when we do return, hopefully we’ll have a new Natural Resources Committee to replace the one that won’t even give this bill fair consideration."
- Truman Hurt
Legislation to stop the dumping of toxic mining wastes into Kentucky's headwater streams fell two votes short of passing the House Appropriations and Revenue Committee Tuesday afternoon. The "stream saver" legislation had 13 favorable votes and only 12 against but did not get the 15 needed to pass when Louisville Reps. Scott Brinkman and Bob DeWeese reneged on commitments to vote for the bill. Both abstained.
After more than four hours of testimony last week, no new testimony was taken today. But the voted was delayed until mid-afternoon while the committee dealt with revenue bills and the budget.
KFTC members are disappointed but were thankful for the courage of Reps. Harry Moberly and Don Pasley to bring the bill before the Appropriations and Revenue Committee. Both pledged to bring the issue up again if the Natural Resources Committee continues to fail to taken water pollution and the burying of streams seriously.
Getting this issue a full hearing before a legislative committee is the result of a tremendous amount of work by KFTC members and allies across the state, and in itself is a great step forward. The detailed data provided by scientists as to the damage being done to the state's waterways — and the cost that all Kentuckians pay because of this — opened the eyes of many people in the room, especially since the coal industry could not refute these facts.
In the the end, though, the power of the money, the opposition of House leadership, and the attitude by some legislators that it's OK for eastern Kentucky to be the state's sacrifice area still held sway with many legislators.
Also a disappointment was the No vote by Rep. Larry Clark of Louisville who
had expressed support for the measure in conversations with
constituents but then said he thought the bill was being heard in the
wrong committee.
Here's how they voted:
YES for protecting water: Reps. Royce Adams, Dwight Butler, Jesse Crenshaw, Derrick Graham, Jimmy Higdon, Jimmie Lee, Harry Moberly, Lonnie Napier, Don Pasley, Rick Rand, Charlie Siler, Arnold Simpson, Jim Wayne
NO for continued pollution: Reps. John Arnold, Larry Clark, James Comer, Keith Hall, Rick Nelson, Fred Nesler, Marie Rader, John Will Stacy, John Vincent, Tommy Turner, Robin Webb, Brent Yonts
PASS: Reps. Scott Brinkman, Bob DeWeese, Danny Ford
ABSENT: Rep. Mike Denham
News coverage of the vote
- "Stream Saver Bill Misses by Two Votes in Committee," Community Correspondents Corps
- "Stream Saver bill dies in committee," Pol Watchers
- "Mining bill falls short by two votes in committee," Louisville Courier Journal
One comment removed for inappropriate and immature language..
Trackback
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.kftc.org/blog/archive/2008/03/11/streamsaver_ARvote/trackbackHB 164
Yes...thank them for contaminating the water. Mountaintop coal removal uses LESS workers...that equals LESS jobs...
The price of keeping the light on keeps going up...while even more become unemployed...
clean water
Come on wake up it is not as if they can move their buisness some where else the coal is here. But you were used as their puppet one more time.
stream saver bill
Ignorant bill or brainwashed residents?
Fact: Kentucky is the 7th highest coal consuming state (www.eredux.com)
Our mountains? I would like to see "our mountains" stay they way they are, not being blown to bits and pieces so a small few can get rich from it.
Our kids? Coal alone releases sulfur dioxide, which not only produces acid rain, but also combines with other pollution (like nitrogen oxide) that forms particulate matter, which our children breathe into their lungs. (www.sierraclub.org)
Our kids? Coal fired power plants are the SINGLE LARGEST man made source of mercury pollution. Mercury IS A KNOWN developmental toxin affecting fetal development, brain damage, and mental retardation. However...it does not only affect women and children. All you have to do is eat fish caught in a stream with mercury contamination and yes, you too could suffer. (www.sierraclub.org)
Our coal? My energy bill is going up. I have yet to benefit from "our coal".
Our future? Its pretty damn bleak, especially when some of us are too blind to see the facts slapping us in the face.
What should I care though? I live in Northern Kentucky, have clean water and I am not dodging fly rock from the mountain blasts. Oh wait...that's right...I have kids, that I am hoping will not have to clean up the mess that the Stream Savers Bill would have stopped.
stream saver bill
H B 164
Regulated?
"The inside of Coal Creek mine in southeastern Kentucky was videotaped by a miner who smuggled a camera into work in June 2004 to document what he said were dangerous conditions." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11029021/ He actually filmed his own death.
"The Martin County slurry spill, at over 300 million gallons, was the largest disaster of its kind ever in the southeastern United States. The spill released nearly 30 times more liquid than the Exxon Valdez." http://www.appalshop.org/cmi/sludgenew.html
I would love to see the places that you talk about. Along with EPA reports (not reposrts from the Army Corps) that says that the land is actually like/better than before.
Regulated
Response to Jonathan and F
During last year's general assembly when the UMWA, miners and the widows of miners were all working in Frankfort to pass laws to make both deep mines and surface mines safer, KFTC members worked right along side of them. KFTC members were down in Frankfort every day lobbying for safer working conditions.
KFTC has over 5,000 members all across the state, and many of our members are your neighbors in eastern Kentucky. We have chapters in Knott, Letcher, Perry, Harlan, Pike and Floyd Counties. Some of these people join KFTC because from the beginning they believe that by organizing we can work to build a more fair and just community, but others seek us out because we are the only ones willing to help. These are the people who live next to a mountaintop or contour mine or above a deep mine and have to live with the problems that come with having a mine as a neighbor.
Cracked foundations, loss os drinking water, cracked windows, doors that will not shut, dust and mud, flooding, fly-rock and subsidence just to name a few of these problems. And yes there are a lot of surface and deep mining laws, if the goal of these laws is to protect people and the environment then these laws are not doing their job.
When you talk with older people about growing up in eastern Kentucky they will often talk about the amazing streams and wonderful swimming holes that use to exist. If you go to Bad Branch Falls and in parts of the Daniel Boone you can still see what they were talking about. Unfortunately most of the streams and creeks of eastern Kentucky have filled in with sediment and are nothing like what was there at one time.
Straight pipes are awful and we need make sewage treatment available to everyone, however, that type of sewage can be filtered out of water rather easily. Where as sediment clogs creeks and leaches heavy metals into our water that can not be filtered out easily. This sediment can also release chemicals that combine to form compounds that settle out covering the bottom of the creek beds with brown or orange or rusty slime that coats the bottom of the stream and chokes all the life out of the stream.
And the argument that we need more flat land in eastern Kentucky rings hollow when there are hundreds and hundreds of acres of flat land there already that is not being used. I would understand if the flat land was only being created near towns like Hazard, but most of this flat land is being create off in the more rural parts of the county. Where there will be no access to water lines and the reclamation leaves the land so compacted and full of shale and rock that nothing but scrub grasses will grow there for a very long time.
I know they say they have methods now that can grow trees on these sites, but the coal companies are only doing that in a few, I think eight, sites across eastern Kentucky and that is only when a university agrees to work with the coal company because the reclamation is more expensive.
Our members in eastern Kentucky want to see the economy grow, but that is hard when people don't want to live in a place where the water is polluted, the many of the smaller roads are full of dangerous coal trucks and you never know when the value of you home will be decreased because a mine decides to move in either next to you or below you.
People live in rural mountainous regions all across the US and in many of these area the land is valuable because people want to live in the mountains with clean streams and pure air.
We need to create a plan to grow the economy of eastern Kentucky in a way that protects the land and allows the people to prosper. But as a friend of mine in Letcher County once told me, "it's hard to heal when your still bleeding."
We all need to work together to solve these problems.
stream saver bill
thank you
Stream Saver Bill
disolve KFTC
CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS
Stream Saver Bill
There is nothing but good about an organization who would work to bring coal severance taxes back to the counties that pay them, or to work to preserve the unmined minerals tax that helps to fund health departments & libraries.
How about emergency action plans for the communities who live downstream from coal slurry impoundments like the Martin County slurry impoundment? Should not first responders know where these dangers lay?
There is nothing in the stream saver bill that would shut down coal mining. The industry has a right to take its coal but it does not have a right to destroy the water. So they can insight you to be angry and nasty but it still does not make it right. And it still is not the truth.
Why don't you just read the bill. Don't take my word.
Emergency Action Plans
Read the bill? I have. Would you like to explain the legal definition of a stream ? I say you don't. So I will It is anywhere 2 raindrops come together. If you are so concerned about water what about the road project on rte 7 just outside out Hazard. They have no sediment control arent you worried about that? How about the runoff at the shopping center development behind your favorite senators house arent you worried about that. How about the sewer problems in Lexington arent you worried about that? No you are not because all you want to do is to pic on coal. Well you have awoken a sleeping gaint and we wont shut up.

HB 164
Eastern KY needs these jobs!!!
Thanks to all the coal miners that risk their lives to provide for their families as well as keep the light on for all of us.